Does emotional speech synchronize brains across listeners?

How do listeners cognitively and physiologically 'catch' the emotions described in spoken or written narratives according to theoretical views?

Listening to emotional descriptions triggers vivid imagery that activates brain emotion circuits and induces somatosensory and visceral changes, enabling emotional contagion.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Which brain regions are thought to reflect modality-independent synchrony triggered by emotional stimulation?

The cortical midline systems, specifically the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the precuneus, which are also part of the default mode network.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

According to neuroimaging literature, what general distinction exists between the cerebral networks encoding valence versus arousal?

Increased arousal is generally linked with enhanced activity in sensory cortices, the amygdala, and the thalamus, while valence is linked to frontal and orbitofrontal activations.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What methodological benefit does studying naturalistic spoken narratives offer for functional connectivity analysis?

Spoken narratives elicit strong, time-variable emotional responses, which allow tracking dynamic, large-scale functional connectivity changes over a prolonged period.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What was the first main hypothesis tested regarding synchrony during semantically affective narratives?

The study hypothesized that listening to semantically affective narratives increases neural synchrony in language- and emotion-related brain circuitries.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What psychiatric or medical exclusion criteria were applied to the participants recruited for this study?

Participants with any history of neurological or psychiatric disease, or those currently taking medications affecting the central nervous system, were excluded.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How was the voice that read the narratives characterized, and why was it chosen this way?

The narratives were read by a neutral female voice without prosodic cues for affect, isolating the semantic content from emotional speech-rate or pitch changes.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did the researchers verify that the low-level acoustic features of the audio did not confound the emotional ratings?

They confirmed there were no statistically significant correlations between valence or arousal ratings and low-level acoustic features like pitch and loudness.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why were behavioral ratings of valence and arousal conducted after, rather than during, the fMRI scanning?

Performing a reporting task during scanning is known to interfere with and alter neural responses to emotional stimuli.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did the researchers rule out head motion as a confound in their time-varying connectivity analyses?

They evaluated Framewise Displacement (FD) and ran non-parametric permutation tests to confirm head motion was not synchronized across subjects or correlated with the experimental regressors.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How does Inter-Subject Phase Synchronization (ISPS) compare to standard sliding-window Inter-Subject Correlation (ISC) in temporal resolution?

ISPS has a temporal resolution of 1 TR (the theoretical maximum), making it temporally more precise than sliding-window ISC, which can smear signals.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why was the BOLD data band-pass filtered specifically to 0.04–0.07 Hz for the ISPS analysis?

This band corresponds to the 'slow four' frequency range, which minimizes physiological noise in connectivity analyses and allows meaningful phase synchrony computation.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why did the researchers convolve their regressors with a single gamma function instead of a double-gamma HRF for ISPS analysis?

ISPS represents intersubject similarity in phase rather than BOLD amplitude; thus, it does not display the post-stimulus hemodynamic undershoot typical of the BOLD signal.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What was the goal of conducting Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) on the fMRI and self-report data?

RSA was used to test if similarity in subjects' moment-to-moment emotional states (valence and arousal) predicted similarity in their voxel-wise BOLD time series.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why did the researchers spatially down-sample the fMRI data to 6x6x6-mm voxels before computing seed-based phase synchronization (SBPS)?

Computing voxel-wise connectivity across all possible pairs of native-resolution voxels at every time point would be computationally prohibitive.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI

What were the observed minimum and maximum mean self-reported ratings of valence and arousal across the narratives?

Mean valence ratings ranged from 1.14 to 8.80, while mean arousal ratings ranged from 1.83 to 8.72.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What was the relationship (correlation) between valence and arousal ratings reported by participants?

Valence and arousal ratings were significantly negatively correlated (r = -0.51).

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did valence and arousal ratings correlate with heart rate and respiration rate?

Valence correlated negatively with both heart and respiration rates, while arousal correlated positively with respiration rate but had no significant correlation with heart rate.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

When analyzing the entire narrative sequence generally, where was intersubject correlation (ISC) primarily observed?

When overall mean ISC was computed, brain activity was synchronized across subjects only in the auditory cortices.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

In which brain regions did intersubject phase synchronization (ISPS) increase as the narratives became more negative (decreasing valence)?

ISPS increased in emotion processing regions (thalamus, ACC, primary somatosensory cortex) and midline regions linked to self-referential processing.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Which brain regions showed increased ISPS as valence increased (positive valence)?

ISPS increased in the dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortices.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

In which regions was the level of emotional arousal positively associated with ISPS?

Arousal was positively associated with ISPS in the medial prefrontal cortex, the auditory cortex, and Broca's area.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What did the Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) reveal about matching emotional states and BOLD signals?

Greater similarity in emotional feelings (valence and arousal) was associated with higher brain similarity in visual and auditory cortices, precuneus, and middle cingulate cortex.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did negative valence affect brain connectivity as measured by seed-based phase synchronization (SBPS)?

Negative valence led to large-scale connectivity changes in fronto-parietal, limbic (insula, cingulum), and fronto-opercular networks, with the insula and inferior temporal cortex as major hubs.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Which regions served as dominant hubs for the widespread connectivity increases associated with positive arousal?

Frontocortical regions were the dominant hubs, with prominent modulations found in connections originating from the striatum, amygdala, thalamus, cerebellum, and dorsal frontal cortex.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What was the level of overlap (Jaccard similarity) between the valence and arousal connectivity networks, and what does this indicate?

The networks showed almost zero overlap (Jaccard similarity range 0 to 0.025), confirming that valence and arousal modulate independent functional networks.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did high arousal and both low/high valence impact connectivity originating from the thalamus and amygdala?

The number of statistically significant connections from the thalamus and amygdala increased significantly during both highly arousing and highly positive/negative narrative episodes.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What role does emotional arousal play in the synchronization of sensory processing across individuals?

Arousal has a modality-independent role in synchronizing how different individuals process sensory details of the external world (e.g., auditory or visual).

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why might the default mode network (DMN) become more synchronized during narratives with negative valence?

The DMN's midline components are thought to be involved in self-referential processing, social processing, and evaluating survival-relevant information from the narrative.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

Why did negative valence synchronize primary somatosensory cortices, according to the authors' theoretical framework?

Emotions trigger specific bodily sensations, and somatosensory cortex activity supports emotional contagion and the internal simulation of others' emotional states.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What correlation was found between behavioral 'action ratings' of the narratives and participants' emotional ratings?

Action ratings correlated significantly with both valence (negatively) and arousal (positively), linking narrative-triggered emotions to simulated bodily actions.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

How did the BOLD GLM activation results compare to the ISPS results?

The BOLD-GLM and ISPS results generally did not overlap, suggesting they index different underlying neural processes.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What theoretical advantage does analyzing response similarity (like ISPS) have over traditional response amplitude analyses?

Analyzing response similarity can reveal shared, higher-order representations and dynamic coordination of brain activity that are not detectable by simple activation magnitude.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What is a key experimental limitation of this study regarding the nature of the synchronization measured?

The study measured synchronous brain activity across multiple observers exposed to the same stimuli, rather than direct brain-to-brain coupling between a speaker and a listener.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified

What does the fluctuation of ISPS in response to semantic content—despite constant acoustic parameters—suggest about the brain?

It suggests that intersubject synchrony is sensitive to higher-order semantic and affective inferences drawn from language, rather than just physical acoustic features.

Source: Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks · DOI · quote verified