Flashcard library · Education · PaperFren
Can a dialogue ITS fix fraction multiplication?
Sixth graders using a dialogue-based math ITS outperformed peers who received traditional remedial instruction on fraction operations.
Keep what you just learned
Save these 12 cards to your NoteFren library. Your first review starts right away, and each card links back to the study it came from.
How many sixth graders were initially enrolled?
89 students from central Taiwan.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
How many participants remained for analysis?
66 participants.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
How were the 66 students assigned?
35 to experimental ITS, 31 to control.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What did the control group receive?
Two hours of traditional remedial instruction.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What content domain did the ITS teach?
Multiplication and division of fractions.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
How many items and total points were in the analysed tests?
24 items totaling 96 points.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What pretest Cronbach’s alpha was reported?
α = 0.879.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
Did the ITS group outperform traditional remediation?
Yes—significantly, F = 5.52, p < 0.05.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What adjusted posttest means were reported?
81.57 (ITS) versus 76.74 (control).
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
How large was the response corpus used to build tutoring?
Responses from 290 sixth graders on a 10-question paper–pencil test.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What research design verified effectiveness?
A quasi-experimental design.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified
What kind of math ITS did the authors develop?
A dialogue-based math ITS for remedial instruction.
Source: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching · DOI · quote verified